Connect with your Facebook Account

Contact

6

Thoughts on the Huskers

Posted by Hiphopopotamus on February 5th, 2010 under Basketball

First off, since Nebraska fans may or may not even know their team has a basketball game tomorrow, let’s talk football. As we all know, National Signing Day coincided with Mullet Wednesday this week. The Huskers had a nice coupe, despite missing on many of their top targets. Though, according to Bo Pelini, it doesn’t matter (when speaking about Owamagbe Odighizuwa):

“It’s his mistake,” Pelini said. “Honestly, I don’t get all caught up in all that. I don’t get all stressed out about whether they’re going to come. If it’s right, they’re going to come. You can drive yourself crazy over the whole thing. In the end, it’s a crapshoot if he’s going to be as good as anyone says he was anyway. I thought he was a pretty good player. But in my mind the kids that don’t choose to come here I don’t believe do themselves a service because I believe we’ll develop them better than the other guy. That’s just the confidence I have.”

Even Better Off Red admits, this one adds to the list of cringe-worthy Pelini moments.

Moving on, the Hawks will welcome in the Huskers tomorrow for one final tune-up prior to the tilt in Austin on Monday. It’s a classic look-ahead game, but even if we are indeed looking ahead, we shouldn’t have a problem moving to 22-1. Normally, I wouldn’t care how this one transpires. Win and move on, no big deal. But after what transpired Wednesday, I’d like to see some things.

1. Return of Xavier Henry – Sooner or later, we’ve got to get something. We’re a great team with or without him, but we’re at another level if he’s clicking even on most cylinders. We’d like to see the whole package, but more than anything, I’d just like to see his stroke come back. If we can get him driving and drawing fouls and attention, all the better. But a simple return to being able to count on him knocking down a few open triples per game would suffice. For now.

2. Tyshawn Taylor – Politely, please use your fucking brain. If we ever get you right between the ears, you’re going to be quite a weapon, on this level and the next.

3. Using the Bench - ScipioTex returned from his hiatus with a couple nice posts, one of why Texas should feature a seven man rotation (7-11 Plan), that also relies on patch-work minutes from their next four. We’re not in that exact position, but we’re close. Right now, we look like this…

The Heavy Lifters: Collins, Aldrich, Morningstar, McMorris
The Regulars: Taylor, X Henry, Markieff, Reed

That’s all well and good, but we’ve got talent and fouls sitting on that bench that we’re not using. I know Bill likes to tighten his rotation, and I’m all for that, but we’ve got to start leaning on a couple others with regularity.

First of, we’ve got to get Collins down to 30 minutes per. And I’d like Aldrich to be somewhere in the 25-30 range. There will be nights we can exceed this, but no one should be averaging over 30 with any consistency. For reference, check out the ‘07-’08 season:

Chalmers – 30
Rush – 29.7
Robinson – 27.5
Arthur – 24.7
Jackson – 24.3
Collins – 23.8
Kaun – 17.7
Stewart – 11.6 (although wieghted heavily from early season when Rush was out/recovering)
Aldrich – 8.3

That’s perfect. And that team didn’t have the extended depth of this one. It had better quality, but not quantity. And yet we used an 8-9 man rotation every night, occasionally pulling in a Jeremy Case, Tyrel Reed or even Matt Kleinmann. For some reason this year we’re stuck on 8, we’ve become almost reluctant to use Xavier, and Bill has to practically be forced to go to Robinson, Johnson, or Withey. All have their shortcomings, but all are plenty capable of contributing. If nothing else, they can give us minutes. Even if we want them out of the game as fast as they come in, they’ll let our main guys grab a seat. Over the course of a season, that advantage is not a small one. They anger Bill, they anger me, and they anger you, but they remain a necessity. If we want our guys fresh at the end of games and the end of March, we’ll buy them some time on the sidelines whether we like it or not.

Nebraska is not a good team and should not give us trouble. We’re coming off two hardfought OT road wins and we’re in for something similar Monday night. We need to play this game with a comfortable lead and work in the rest of our rotation. I’d like to see it become a regular staple, but that won’t happen until he develops some trust with them, and there’s no better opportunity than tomorrow’s game.

(Related thought not specific to tomorrow: I like Elijah (and I called for a last second alley-oop to him Wednesday), but we’re probably not going to be working in another guard anytime this season. What I firmly believe we need, thoguh, is a fourth big. We need someone to play Aldrich’s role in ‘07-’08… not someone we count on to carry the torch, but someone to come in, go hard after boards, play some D and keep us fresh. I think Robinson’s perfect for that, but we’ve got to let him emerge.)

Thoughts?

More from this Author


Share This

  • StumbleUpon

6 Responses

  1. Completely agree with everything here. We absolutely need to bring the minutes down on Collins and Aldrich.

  2. Hiphop–you’re preachin’ to the choir…would love to see some fresh legs in there from time to time, especially in March! In reference to your 4th big, I think Withey would be a safer bet. Just for the simple fact I don’t see him getting too fancy with bball (j-wright-itous) when he gets it in or near the paint. Plus, Withey is more sound with his footwork from what limited time I’ve seen him play. Robinson needs to remember to dribble (if applicable) before he takes two steps. However, I truly believe Robinson’s ceiling is much higher than Withey’s in athleticism and drive. Can you image Robinson developing that sweet baby hook Manning had??? Overall, my vote would be split time between Withey/Robinson depending on matchups. Put in Robinson when the bigs on the other team are more athletic and quick and Withey when the opposite bigs are more methodical and deliberate. BTW–had me cracking up after your TT comment. Rock Chalk!

  3. Here’s hoping we get EJ, Withey and TRob a good 10+ minutes today. We could use a romp ‘em type game.

    I think, like many of us do, that TRob could be a tournament factor if he can get some minutes and let the game slow down a bit. You can’t coach his kind of athleticism, but you can coach his mental mistakes…I just hope he get’s it enough to be a spark this year. I am still cautiously optimistic this can happen for him, less so with Withey. They both may be a year off though, if we are being completely honest.

    BC making it close finally against Duke…

  4. Hiphopopotamus said:

    February 6th, 2010 at 7:25 pm

    I know it sounds like “spoiled Jayhawk fan,” but that really was a disappointing win. We’ve got to learn to step on the throat and we’re just not seeing it from this team. And that’s the second straight horrible FT performance…I’m optimistically chalking it up to tired legs. I was happy with us taking a 4 point deficit into a 19 point lead in about 10 minutes, though. Thought we saw some good signs from X too. Monday should be fun.

  5. Hiphop: You left out the part where you say that after this game it’s obvious that T-Rob ain’t gonna be good enough on D this year to be the 4th guy. He’s spends more time lost than he does in correct position. I love T-Rob. I think he’ll be an all-Big 12 guy before he’s done. But he simply is a liability on defense because he doesn’t know what the hell he’s doing.

    Withey, however, looks completely capable of coming in, playing tough D, blocking a couple shots, and knocking down a shot when it’s there on offense… aka being the 4th big.

  6. Hiphopopotamus said:

    February 7th, 2010 at 7:38 am

    I’m not as convinced as you are on Thomas. But your larger point, that Withey has stepped up nicely in his limited time, may be the difference. I think Robinson would start to play thru that stuff if he played more, but if Withey is ‘getting it’ in limited time, then maybe he’s earned the nod. Distant probably had the right idea with spot duty for each based on matchups.

Leave a Reply

Related Articles